Transparency
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Apr 16, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Criticized the lack of transparency and honesty regarding data centers, citing studies on water and electricity depletion, and questioned the job creation claims, suggesting data centers are used for surveillance.
City Council (Regular) - Apr 16, 2026 →Stated that the council has already made up its mind and is only holding the public hearing due to legal requirements. Criticized the council's dismissive reactions and lack of transparency.
City Council (Regular) - Apr 16, 2026 →Stated that if the data center project is passed, a recall will start tomorrow. She also noted that residents can speak for as long as they want during public comments.
City Council (Regular) - Apr 16, 2026 →Clarified previous public comments, noting that public record request volume has increased by 70% rather than decreased, and commended staff and the city attorney's office for handling heavy workloads.
City Council Workshop - Apr 2, 2026 · 9:24 →Criticized the city for withholding contracts and studies related to the proposed data center project under trade secret exemptions, arguing that executed contracts and overall pricing must be publicly disclosed.
City Council Workshop - Apr 2, 2026 · 30:10 →Criticized city leadership and the city attorney regarding transparency, open records, and the release of body camera footage.
City Council (Regular) - Mar 19, 2026 · 9:44 →Highlighted a decline in approved open records requests over recent years and questioned data center claims.
City Council (Regular) - Mar 19, 2026 · 17:08 →