Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TERS No. 6)
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 8, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Opposed the creation of TERS No. 6, arguing it pre-allocates tax revenue to expressway corridors and deprives other parts of the city of infrastructure funding.
City Council POM Meeting — June 8, 2026 · 17:25 →Highlighted railroad crossing bottlenecks and traffic concerns near Willow Bend, suggesting data collection for federal grants.
City Council POM Meeting — June 8, 2026 · 18:47 →Raised concerns about whether a regional entertainment venue is appropriate for a suburban residential area, citing traffic and taxpayer risk.
City Council POM Meeting — June 8, 2026 · 20:53 →Argued that the TERS area is already overdeveloped and affluent, calling the plan corporate welfare for a billionaire sports franchise.
City Council POM Meeting — June 8, 2026 · 20:53 →Expressed strong support for the Willow Bend redevelopment and TERS No. 6 while requesting traffic studies, neighborhood safety measures, and police patrols.
City Council POM Meeting — June 8, 2026 · 1:10:39 →Expressed concern about sports team mobility and potential dead stadiums, warning against increased traffic and draining city tax dollars.
City Council POM Meeting — June 8, 2026 · 27:06 →