Business Jobs
Broadband Ordinance
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (4)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Apr 6, 2026.
Public comments (4)
OpposedJD SalinasApr 6, 2026
Representing AT&T, he argued that the city's broadband ordinance is anti-competitive and shifts costs to developers.
City Commission - Apr 6, 2026 · 53:30 →OpposedGeorge (Charter Communications)Apr 6, 2026
Representing Charter/Spectrum, he argued the ordinance violates state law and stifles competition.
City Commission - Apr 6, 2026 · 55:30 →OpposedNed MunozMar 25, 2026
Representing Charter Communications, he argued the city's fiber conduit mandate is legally problematic and hurts competition.
City Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 15:31 →OpposedMario BarraganMar 25, 2026
Representing AT&T, he stated the ordinance creates a competitive imbalance and shifts costs to developers.
City Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 22:17 →