Accessory Structure Size Limits

Paul supports increasing the floor area to 3% for lots over 20,000 sq ft, finding it a good balance between property rights and neighborhood protection, and is comfortable with the current proposal.

Jay reiterates that SUPs provide a mechanism to review cases individually, allowing for adjustments based on specific circumstances and neighbor input.

Mike feels the current 2.5% floor area limit for lots over 20,000 sq ft is too small, suggesting 4% might be more appropriate and aligns with many approved SUPs.

Paul agrees with Jay's recommendation to keep the SUP threshold at 20,000 sq ft and supports the 3% increase for lots under 40,000 sq ft, emphasizing the need for balance.

Paul believes the proposed 3% increase for lots under 40,000 sq ft offers a good balance and is comfortable with the current direction, including the potential removal of wall height restrictions.

Aaron asks if SUPs will be available for lots under 20,000 sq ft, questioning where the line should be drawn for SUP eligibility.

Jay supports allowing SUPs for lots over 20,000 sq ft to gauge demand before potentially adjusting regulations, and suggests 4% might be a reasonable increase for mid-sized lots.

Aaron suggests a 'whichever is greater' approach for smaller lots, like 500 sq ft or 3%, to provide more flexibility, noting that a modern 2-car garage is about 400 sq ft.

Jay recommends keeping the SUP eligibility threshold at 20,000 sq ft for now, allowing the commission to observe how the new regulations perform.