Residential Treatment Center Proposal

Opposed the permit due to safety and traffic concerns.

Worried about the safety of her children and the nature of the facility's admission criteria.

Raised concerns about traffic congestion and the safety of his elderly family members.

Advocated for mental health but argued the site is logistically unsuitable for this facility.

Argued the location is unsafe for the residents of the facility and the neighborhood.

Highlighted past safety issues in the neighborhood and argued that the facility is not a good fit.

Questioned the lack of detail in the application and shared negative experiences with past group homes.

Stated that he would feel like a prisoner in his own home and raised concerns about facility management.

Objected to the facility, stating that a residential neighborhood is not the appropriate location for a treatment center.

Opposed the permit, citing concerns about noise, traffic, and the potential for future commercial creep.

Opposed the facility due to traffic and safety concerns, and questioned the adequacy of public notice.

Expressed concerns about security and the safety of elderly residents in the neighborhood.

Argued that the business would negatively impact traffic and property values.

Stated that while she supports helping youth, this location is not the right choice.

Raised concerns about the facility's website language and the potential for violence.

Stated he lives directly across the street and strongly opposes the business.

Opposed the facility due to safety concerns for her grandchildren and the neighborhood's family-centered character.

Stated the community is safe and quiet and does not want the facility.