King Arthur Traffic Calming

Stated the project was an 'extreme swing' that created hazards where none existed before.

Requested swift action to remove or augment the barriers and suggested testing paint and reflectors instead.

Argued that the parking curbs are a 'terrible solution' and suggested that police enforcement is a better way to handle speeding.

Suggested that the city add tapered white line striping to help drivers see the bump-outs and avoid accidents.

Reported seeing multiple accidents caused by the new barriers and asked the council to find a safer design.

Supported the project, arguing it has successfully slowed traffic and that the 'silent majority' of residents want it to stay.

Documented 25 accidents and mentioned a neighbor's recent injury, urging the city to remove the concrete barriers.

Called for a pause and reevaluation of the project, arguing it traded an enforcement problem for a physical hazard.

Criticized the project's planning process, noting that engineering designs were finalized before traffic data was collected.

Requested a swift safety evaluation of the current road conditions.

Criticized the project's aesthetics and safety, urging the council to find a new solution.

Reported multiple accidents and vehicle damage caused by the new bike lane barriers.

Highlighted safety concerns regarding the lack of 'forgiveness' for drivers on the narrowed road.

Argued the project is an overcorrection and requested removal of the concrete barriers.