King Arthur Boulevard Traffic Calming
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 18
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 15, 2026.
Public comments (24)
Expressed concern that narrowed lanes around bump-outs create collision risks and urged the council to bring bump-outs inward by six inches.
City Council — September 15, 2026 · 37:13 →A local cyclist supported removing bike lane barriers and warned that tactile buttons must not be slick or hazardous for bicycle tires.
City Council — September 15, 2026 · 40:46 →Criticized the original traffic calming design as a mistake addressing speeding rather than road safety, urging the city to remove bump-outs entirely.
City Council — September 15, 2026 · 43:28 →Expressed concern about the order of operations regarding temporary striping and questioned the safety impacts of mountable curbs.
City Council — September 15, 2026 · 47:08 →Criticized reliance solely on engineering data over real-life resident experiences and urged the complete removal of bump-outs.
City Council — September 15, 2026 · 50:02 →Criticized city engineering expertise and project design, presenting hubcaps left behind by motorists and urging complete removal of bump-outs and barriers.
City Council — September 15, 2026 · 53:12 →Criticized the design process and requested removal of barriers and bump-outs.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:56:02 →Concerned about emergency vehicle access and the lack of visibility of the barriers.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 2:03:38 →Reported vehicle damage from the barriers and requested their immediate removal.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:39:11 →Supports the project, emphasizing that the cost of a life is worth the inconvenience of flat tires.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:45:35 →Supports the project, arguing that drivers hitting the curbs are simply distracted.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 2:09:32 →Argued the project is an overcorrection and requested the removal of concrete barriers.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:35:44 →Supports the project, citing that protected bike lanes improve safety and that drivers should be more attentive.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:32:11 →Requested lower, less damaging alternatives to the current concrete curbs.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:48:52 →As a cyclist, stated the current design makes the road less safe and requested removal of barriers.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 2:19:31 →Stated the project is unnecessary and poorly executed, requesting removal of the barriers.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:41:58 →Requested immediate striping improvements and long-term modifications to the bump-outs.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 2:06:05 →Called the project an overcorrection and requested a return to common-sense measures.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:59:11 →Presented data on vehicle impacts and requested removal of the concrete barriers.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 2:12:31 →Supports traffic calming but noted near-misses with drivers using the bike lane to turn.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:29:58 →Argued the design is unsuitable for the neighborhood and requested removal of the barriers.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:52:04 →Raised concerns about winter weather, ice, and potential liability for the city regarding the bike barriers.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:27:41 →Concerned about the narrowness of the bike lanes and the safety of cyclists.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 1:44:03 →Questioned the engineering design and requested removal of the concrete barriers.
City Council — August 19, 2026 · 2:16:02 →