Data Center Regulation
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Data Center Regulation→At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 15, 2026.
Public comments (9)
An attorney from Coppell who commended Lewisville for taking proactive steps on data center regulations amidst statewide drought and water restrictions.
City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:24:44 →Praised the council for closing the by-right warehouse loophole for data centers and urged them to continue adding performance standards for water and power.
City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:28:30 →Represented Wells Fargo, operator of a data center on Edmunds Lane, noting their facility has net-zero water use for cooling and asking for existing facilities to remain legally conforming.
City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:24:18 →Expressed concern about high-impact data centers consuming vast amounts of water and energy, raising utility bills, and urged the council to pass the SUP ordinance.
City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:06:19 →Urged the council to think generationally and implement strict transparency and scrutiny regarding data centers and water resources.
City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:09:52 →Represented Digital Realty (an existing data center operator) and asked for existing facilities to be grandfathered as legally conforming rather than non-conforming.
City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:10:05 →A local teacher and resident who voiced support for the data center regulations to protect students and the community.
City Council — June 15, 2026 · 1:16:07 →Representing Digital Realty, he expressed concern about 'legal non-conforming' status and suggested grandfathering existing sites.
Planning and Zoning Commission — May 19, 2026 · 6:58 →Representing Wells Fargo, she argued the amendment is premature and could hinder their ongoing expansion project.
Planning and Zoning Commission — May 19, 2026 · 23:49 →