Proposed City Hall P3 Project

Delivered additional petition signatures opposing the City Hall project and urged the council to vote no.

Questioned the financial sense of committing to a multi-million dollar City Hall lease when roads and infrastructure need repair.

Argued that council members work for the citizens and suggested alternate locations like an old grocery store or vacant land near the recreation center.

Expressed concern that a City Hall in the town square would divide the community and suggested building a splash pad or playground for kids instead.

Called the City Hall lease structure 'senile' and argued that taxpayers shouldn't fund a multi-million dollar building they won't own.

Urged fiscal responsibility, sharing a cautionary tale about a church that lost its property due to borrowing money for a parking lot.

Urged the council to put the $63 million City Hall decision on the ballot for voters to decide in May.

Raised questions about the justification for the new City Hall, its location, lease terms, and the future of the existing building.

Warned that if the P3 project passes, residents will campaign against council members in future elections and demand staff firings.

Criticized city spending on a new building while neighborhood streets have potholes and recreation facilities lack maintenance.