water-utilities

Provided professional hydrological perspective on karst features, dye tests, and erosion risks.

Expressed scientific opposition to Hays Commons, citing risks to the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone.

Questioned whether developers should secure regulatory approvals before seeking county development agreements.

Spoke in favor of temporary water protections and voiced water security concerns.

Supported emergency water protections and highlighted declining river flows and aquifer stress.

Urged the court to protect water resources and prioritize life over special interests.

Urged the court to vote no on Hays Commons and protect the Edwards Aquifer.

Raised concerns over open space claims, effluent spraying, and private well protections.

Stressed the importance of water protection and proposed protective setbacks.

Criticized closed-door water summits and urged the court to implement guardrails for developers.