SpaceX Semiconductor Facility

Detailed technical concerns regarding massive water usage, reverse osmosis waste, toxic chemicals like PFAS, and wastewater treatment issues.

Voiced strong support for Elon Musk building the chip center to help the U.S. win technological races against China, believing taxes generated will reduce overall burdens.

Expressed concern that the county negotiated with xai and SpaceX for months while publicly dismissing residents' fears about data centers and semiconductor plants.

Urged the court to exercise wisdom and prioritize the safety, water, and way of life of local families over big money.

Argued that since SpaceX has already purchased land and decided to come to Grimes County, tax abatements are completely unnecessary.

Asked what will happen to families living within the five-mile radius of the project and called for an independent environmental study.

Criticized the rushed notice process and lack of town halls, urging the court to follow its own adopted guidelines and criteria.

Strongly urged the court not to give tax incentives to Elon Musk, noting Grimes County already offers great infrastructure and low regulations.

Requested that any deal bring significant proven benefits to local residents and include strict, measurable job requirements limited to U.S. citizens.

Highlighted SpaceX's massive private market valuation and argued they do not need tax abatements; urged onerous compliance provisions and infrastructure funding.

Warned that technology quickly becomes obsolete and asked what plans are in place to ensure the company cleans up abandoned facilities rather than leaving taxpayers holding the bill.

Asked the court to postpone action, hold a town hall, and let residents understand the full incentive picture including state Jedi programs.

Voiced frustration over the lack of communication from officials and felt the process felt like a kangaroo court ignoring resident input.

Representing cattlemen, spoke against the loss of agricultural land to industrialization and technology, which threatens the county's food supply and rural heritage.

Criticized the secretive nature of the project and warned of permanent negative impacts on day-to-day lifestyle, noise, and pollution.

Feared that promised jobs will go to outsiders, strained county infrastructure will increase taxes for residents, and urged denial of tax abatements.

Advised patience, reliance on factual information rather than internet rumors, and trust in elected officials as the public meeting process moves forward.

Expressed concerns about the impact of the SpaceX project on local wildlife, hunting, and family property near Gibbons Creek, urging the court to represent residents over tech interests.

Spoke about preserving rural dark skies, quietness, and family legacy in Carlos, asking who is protecting existing residents and the environment.

Asked about the true boundaries, acreage, and whether officials had signed non-disclosure agreements regarding the Gibbons Creek site.

The CEO of Greater Brazos Partnership spoke in favor of the project, highlighting thousands of well-paying jobs, massive payroll, and safeguards protecting taxpayers.

Highlighted the toxic chemicals and enormous water/energy use associated with semiconductor manufacturing, urging the county to require environmental health studies before granting incentives.

Representing Grimes County Citizens for Proper Development, asked the court to be frugal negotiators and protect local residents.

Cited health hazards associated with semiconductor fabrication jobs and demanded that SpaceX prove the project is safe before receiving tax incentives.

Raised serious questions regarding the history of the Gibbons Creek coal/lignite site, groundwater monitoring, endangered species, and agency oversight.

Questioned whether the county followed its own mandatory review committee procedures in proper chronological order before discussing tax abatements.

Expressed support for the data center for national security reasons but warned commissioners to drive a hard bargain against a cutthroat businessman.

Warned about industrial disasters throughout history and urged the court to demand best practices and establish an environmental cleanup fund.

Argued that Elon Musk is exceptionally wealthy and does not need tax incentives, and criticized corporate welfare.

Expressed deep concerns about emergency services, hazardous materials response, fire department readiness, and ensuring taxpayers do not foot the bill.

Warned that rapid industrial growth drives up local rents, strains services, and brings out-of-state workers while leaving residents to deal with negative impacts.

Expressed concerns about the lack of transparency regarding the SpaceX project and potential environmental risks.

Requested specific information and maps regarding the SpaceX project and raised concerns about environmental guidelines.

Expressed opposition to tax abatements for SpaceX, citing health and environmental dangers associated with chip manufacturing plants.

Defended elected officials against accusations of dishonesty, urged patience, and noted that legal restrictions prevent sharing pending transaction details prematurely.

Stated that while the county cannot prevent SpaceX from locating here, taxpayers should not subsidize one of the world's wealthiest corporations.

Expressed support for negotiating with SpaceX to secure the best possible deal and protections, noting many residents are excited about the project.

Stanced that health, safety, and strict regulatory enforcement must be central to any abatement negotiations given the massive scale of the facility.

Consulted water experts and calculated that Gibbons Creek Reservoir has a firm yield of nearly 9,740 acre-feet per year, assuring water availability.

Urged the court to approve the agreement to bring much-needed tax revenue, road improvements, and better resources for emergency services.

Requested strict, measurable written protections in tax abatements covering road repairs, water usage, emergency services, and strong clawbacks.

Expressed trust in elected officials and supported the abatement, believing the project will bring jobs and lower residential taxes.

Suggested tying tax incentives to strict environmental compliance, on-site solar/wind energy generation, greywater recycling, and zero landfill waste.

Asked for clarity on the boundaries of the SpaceX reinvestment zone and questioned who will control the Gibbons Creek dam.

Highlighted past EPA and TCEQ fines against SpaceX for water discharges, argued tax abatements are immoral given safety concerns, and asked for a moratorium.

Objected to tax abatements unless health and safety are protected, urging the court to enforce its own criteria and secure strong safeguards.

Expressed support for the project, calling it creative and innovative, and offered prayers of wisdom for the court.

Called for stricter rules, denial of tax abatements, environmental impact studies, and a temporary moratorium similar to Hill County.

Praised Hill County for pausing industrial projects to study infrastructure and safety impacts, and asked if Grimes County will stand with them.

Stated that tax abatements give the county a seat at the table to negotiate local hiring, school partnerships, environmental safeguards, and road protections.

Acknowledged the county's financial needs and fear among residents, urging proactive negotiations for upfront corporate benchmarks and strong enforcement clauses.

Encouraged the court to open up proceedings, publish the proposed tax abatement agreement, and share revenue projections before voting.