Right-of-Way Abandonment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 22, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Argued that closing Avenue P violates the comprehensive plan and primarily benefits a private hotel business.
Planning Commission - Sep 22, 2026 · 28:43 →Opposed the closure, stating it disrupts the city's historic street grid and confuses visitors.
Planning Commission - Sep 22, 2026 · 20:45 →Voiced strong opposition to closing Avenue P, citing severe traffic redirection issues near a children's center and medical facility.
Planning Commission - Sep 22, 2026 · 13:58 →Expressed opposition, explaining how closing the street would complicate hospital routes and worsen traffic bottlenecks.
Planning Commission - Sep 22, 2026 · 17:34 →Formally opposed the street abandonment, citing comprehensive plan policies protecting the 1838 grid pattern.
Planning Commission - Sep 22, 2026 · 21:53 →Urged commissioners to vote down the Avenue P abandonment to protect public safety and municipal infrastructure.
Planning Commission - Sep 22, 2026 · 24:07 →Highlighted safety risks for children and pets on narrow residential streets absorbing diverted traffic.
Planning Commission - Sep 22, 2026 · 27:28 →Spoke in favor of the right-of-way abandonment adjacent to 10302 Seawall Boulevard.
City Council - Jun 25, 2026 · 0:00 →Questioned the number of abandonments on the agenda.
City Council - May 28, 2026 →