Stormwater Utility Fee

Questioned the timing of a water plant construction during a moratorium and Howard Hughes's development, and stated that citizens' money goes to developers.

Expressed concern about ensuring fees are used properly when the city failed to inspect drainage issues in his subdivision.

Asked if financial projections had been conducted for the stormwater fee, and was told they had not.

Argued that everyone should pay the stormwater fee, regardless of private infrastructure, and that funds should prioritize the worst-affected neighborhoods.

Asked if the proposed ordinance would allow for fee credits for properties with sufficient private drainage systems, and was told it could be considered later.

Stated that presentations always focus on newer subdivisions and suggested solutions for older, lower-income neighborhoods on the east side.

Asked if the city could implement fee credits now rather than later, and was told it would be an analysis at a later date.

Attributed the need for fees to past council's overspending on projects like a hotel and the Oscar Johnson Center.

Expressed hesitation to incur more costs for citizens without projections and suggested tabling the item.

Argued against exemptions for those with private drainage systems, comparing it to not paying for police if you have a security gate.

Expressed concern about the city's ability to keep up with development and questioned the fairness of exemptions for those with private drainage systems.

Mentioned that some MUDs already maintain detention areas and questioned why stormwater fees are being considered before annexation.

Expressed concern that citizens' money is going to developers through credits and that the city cannot keep up with development.

Stated that if the fee doesn't cover older communities left behind, it's not a solution, and suggested tabling it for new council members.

Stated that Lake Conroe Forest drainage is horrendous and questioned taxing them if services aren't provided.

Asked to table the drainage fees until new council members can review them, citing concerns for older communities and the upcoming election.