ALPR Cameras

Opposed Flock cameras, questioning the level of surveillance and the need for transparency regarding data collection and access.

Agreed with opposition to Flock cameras and offered to remove them for free. Also discussed concerns about the power and water usage of data centers.

Asked the council not to fund Flock cameras, suggesting the funds could be better used for hiring more police officers.

Shared personal experiences and community feedback opposing Flock cameras, emphasizing accountability and the need to return privacy to citizens.

Provided an update on cities discontinuing Flock contracts and urged the council to not appropriate funds for Flock safety, citing its non-appropriation clause.

Asked the council to vote against funding Flock cameras, emphasizing the importance of balancing security with liberty and the growing public concern over mass surveillance.

Asked the council to remove Flock funding from the budget due to data privacy, capability, and liberty issues, citing low arrest rates compared to scans.

Encouraged the council to not appropriate more money for Flock, citing concerns about evolving technology and potential future misuse.

Asked the council to stop funding Flock cameras, noting that other cities are canceling contracts and questioning the program's cost, privacy impact, and erosion of trust.

Urged the council to listen to constituents and vote against funding Flock cameras, emphasizing the need for less cameras and more officers for safety and trust.

Advocated against funding Flock cameras, citing public opposition, actions by other states and officials, and the importance of preserving Fourth Amendment rights.

Expressed concern about data privacy and supported the HOT tax reform.

Argued that the cameras violate privacy and should be turned off.

Raised concerns about the Flock camera contract, privacy, and lack of council oversight.