Oak Creek Tennis Center
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Nov 18, 2025.
Public comments (38)
President of Carrollton Tennis Association supported the change, citing expanded pickleball community access and facility improvements.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 2:09:57 →Raised concerns about market competition and regional monopolies.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:47:38 →Expressed concern regarding creek drainage and flood impacts from potential future facility expansions.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:48:53 →Questioned whether approving outside commercial management represents the best interest of Carrollton citizens.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:50:32 →Urged council to review data regarding staff turnover at other impact-managed facilities.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:52:04 →Praised the modest, community-centered atmosphere of Oak Creek and urged council to preserve it.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:53:31 →Current Oak Creek tennis pro and former Fretz Tennis Center director spoke in support of Impact Activities' management.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:55:49 →Shared negative experiences with current maintenance and league scheduling, supporting the change.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:57:09 →Academy director at Courts of McKinney praised Impact Activities' support and program growth.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:59:28 →Raised concerns about price increases at other impact-managed facilities.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 2:01:43 →Junior player shared negative experiences with class sizes and advancement policies at McKinney under Impact.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 2:04:00 →Spoke in support of Impact Activities' community programs, including Buddy Up for individuals with disabilities.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 2:05:51 →Shared positive personal experiences participating in adaptive pickleball programs supported by Impact Activities.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 2:08:18 →Former director and operator spoke about assisting with a smooth transition to Impact Activities.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:21:40 →Resident of 20 years raised concerns about membership-driven models and potential price increases under Impact Activities.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:21:49 →Representing Acing Autism, spoke in support of Impact Activities' community programs at other facilities.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:24:07 →Parent of a junior player compared hourly rates at Oak Creek versus Impact facilities, urging council to keep current management.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:25:31 →Longtime Carrollton resident and former employee opposed the change, citing fairness and community preference.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:28:18 →Expressed concern that Impact Activities would negatively affect regular, non-wealthy recreational players.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:30:18 →An 11-year-old player spoke about the strong relationships built with current coaches and urged no change.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:32:27 →A 12-year-old player praised Coach Brett and asked the council to keep the current management team.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:33:44 →Expressed concern over a regional monopoly by Impact Activities and potential loss of consumer choices.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:36:02 →Single mother spoke about how affordable and safe Oak Creek has been for her daughter.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:38:27 →Highlighted differences in cancellation policies and reservation access between Oak Creek and Impact facilities.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:40:34 →Spoke on behalf of families concerned about affordability and community access.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:43:03 →Asked council to table the vote and further investigate community feedback.
City Council — November 18, 2025 · 1:45:14 →A 12-year-old player shared how much Oak Creek means to her and expressed fear that new corporate management would ruin the supportive community.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 54:25 →A long-time resident and tennis coach questioned the transparency of the bidding process and warned against hiring Impact Activities.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 58:04 →Shared her positive experiences training at Oak Creek and praised the current director and coaches.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 1:01:30 →Expressed love for Oak Creek's community and asked that it stay the same.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 1:04:11 →Shared concerns about deteriorating quality under Impact Activities at other facilities and praised Oak Creek's current progress.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 1:07:57 →Newly appointed president of CTA spoke in support of Impact Activities, noting positive experiences at other facilities.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 1:10:59 →A local teacher urged council to listen to the community's heart and keep Oak Creek locally managed.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 1:14:34 →Expressed support for keeping tennis facilities under local city management rather than corporate hands.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 1:17:06 →Questioned where profits would come from under a for-profit management company.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 1:18:23 →Former Parks and Rec board member emphasized that Oak Creek was built with bond funds to serve residents, not for corporate profit.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 1:19:51 →Spoke about the success of Oak Creek Tennis Center under current management and urged council not to hand it over to Impact Activities.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 51:11 →Warned against Impact Activities based on negative past experiences at McKinney courts and urged council to keep Oak Creek local.
City Council — October 28, 2025 · 1:05:23 →