BTU Solar Compensation Policy

Suggested various options for grandfathering or phasing in the new rates.

Questioned why the policy change was not announced for public input.

Argued that the city should grandfather existing solar customers under their original contracts.

Requested grandfathering for existing solar customers, calling the original agreement a 'covenant'.

Asked the city to protect investments made by residents who relied on the previous solar program.

Stated that the rate change would triple his electric bill and requested grandfathering.

Opposed the billing change and requested grandfathering for existing systems.

Questioned the legality of voiding existing contracts and requested grandfathering.

Requested grandfathering for existing customers to maintain trust and fairness.

Called the rate change unfair and unethical, requesting grandfathering.

Requested that the city honor existing contracts and provide economic justification for the changes.

Expressed disappointment in the lack of notice and requested grandfathering.

Requested grandfathering, noting that the investment was based on the original contract.

Argued that the new policy contradicts the city's own energy efficiency goals.

Spoke on behalf of Dr. Jim Kirby, noting the lack of representation for residents outside city limits.