Flock Safety Surveillance
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 13
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Aug 25, 2026.
Public comments (13)
Opposed the cameras, citing concerns about individual sovereignty and government overreach.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 24:34 →Criticized the lack of transparency in the procurement process for the cameras.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 29:45 →Opposed the cameras, arguing they are ineffective and a threat to freedom.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 41:32 →Asked technical questions about data security and storage.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 38:45 →Opposed the cameras, citing privacy and security risks.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 26:56 →Opposed the cameras, citing concerns about facial recognition and lack of public consent.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 43:38 →Opposed the cameras, citing concerns about privacy and potential for abuse.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 35:33 →Supported the cameras, arguing they are necessary to combat rising crime.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 21:00 →Raised concerns about data custody and the recording of children.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 32:38 →Supported the use of Flock cameras, citing their effectiveness in solving local crimes.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 11:08 →Opposed the cameras, citing his professional experience with surveillance technology.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 46:35 →Opposed the surveillance network, citing Fourth Amendment concerns.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 14:32 →Supported maintaining the technology but emphasized the need for accountability.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 17:30 →